Friday, February 25, 2011

If many prescription drugs are highly addictive, why aren't more of the drug companies being held responsible?

If someone becomes addicted to a drug prescribed by a doctor and the doctor said the drugs are safe by the FDA and drug manufacturers themselves, because there are companies pharmacudical be forced to financially compensate the city that were most affected by abuse prescription drugs? Why are not lawmakers in Washington did nothing to protect people who have no intention of becoming a "high", but they become addicted to the simple nature of the addictive properties of drugs? It would be such an examination of prescribing medications to reduce, at least to some extent the violence and crime often associated with companies that have people who are addicted to prescription drugs? Why are pharmaceutical companies are obliged to provide treatment facilities, rather than American taxpayers to foot the bill? All mature comments relevant to the topic are welcome, as well as past experiences with relatives or friends who have had problems with prescription drugs. The law, which President Bush hold drug companies thats why they are signs of why drug manufacturers can be held liable when they clearly show that the performance of the addict? She knew that if you're under it began, and that your dr. He did not say at this particular substance. There are many ways in the prescription drugs .

0 comments:

Post a Comment